Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1983 (6) TMI 74 - AT - Wealth-tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal partially grants appeals on jewellery valuation but rejects claims on interest, vehicle, and share values. The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, granting relief on the valuation of jewellery for the assessment year 1979-80. However, other contentions by the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Tribunal partially grants appeals on jewellery valuation but rejects claims on interest, vehicle, and share values.

                            The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals, granting relief on the valuation of jewellery for the assessment year 1979-80. However, other contentions by the assessee regarding the inclusion of accrued interest in net wealth, value of vehicles, and shares of Lake Shore Palace Hotel Pvt. Ltd. were not upheld. The Tribunal directed the exclusion of deemed interest from net wealth for all four assessment years and found the values assessed by the authorities for vehicles and shares reasonable, declining to interfere with the CWT(A)'s orders.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Valuation of jewellery
                            2. Inclusion of accrued interest in net wealth
                            3. Value of vehicles included in net wealth
                            4. Value of shares of Lake Shore Palace Hotel Pvt. Ltd.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Valuation of Jewellery:
                            For the assessment years 1977-78, 1978-79, 1979-80, and 1980-81, the primary issue was the valuation of jewellery. The values returned by the assessee, assessed by the WTO, and fixed by the CWT(A) varied. The CWT(A) observed that the assessee had adopted the value of jewellery based on a valuation report from March 1975 and noted an increase in value over the years. The assessee contested that there was no increase in value due to the jewellery being primarily studded with precious stones and having minimal gold content. However, the CWT(A) referenced a pamphlet from the Gem and Jewellery Export Promotion Council, Bombay, indicating increases in value for diamonds and gold. The Tribunal upheld the CWT(A)'s valuation for 1977-78, 1978-79, and 1980-81, but found the valuation for 1979-80 slightly high, reducing it to Rs. 3 lakhs, granting the assessee relief of Rs. 37,300.

                            2. Inclusion of Accrued Interest in Net Wealth:
                            The second issue was the inclusion of accrued interest from loans given by the assessee in the net wealth. The assessee argued that since the accounts were maintained on a cash basis, the interest not received should not be included. The CWT(A) disagreed, holding that the right to receive interest constituted an asset. The Tribunal, referencing the Karnataka High Court's judgment in A.T. Mirji vs. CWT, concluded that income not received under a cash accounting system should not be considered an asset. It directed the WTO to exclude the deemed interest from the net wealth for all four assessment years.

                            3. Value of Vehicles Included in Net Wealth:
                            The third issue involved the value of vehicles claimed as exempt under s. 5(1)(viii) of the WT Act. The assessee owned three vehicles, and the WTO had determined their values, allowing statutory exemptions and including the balance in net wealth. The CWT(A) upheld these additions. The Tribunal found the values assessed by the authorities reasonable, considering the appreciation in vehicle values and normal wear and tear, and decided not to interfere with the CWT(A)'s orders.

                            4. Value of Shares of Lake Shore Palace Hotel Pvt. Ltd.:
                            The final issue, specific to the assessment year 1980-81, concerned the value of shares of Lake Shore Palace Hotel Pvt. Ltd. The assessee had shown a lower value in the WT return than the purchase price. The WTO adopted the purchase price as the market value due to the lack of evidence from the assessee. The CWT(A) upheld this valuation. The Tribunal, noting the absence of evidence or the balance sheet of Lake Shore Palace Hotel Pvt. Ltd. from the assessee, declined to interfere with the authorities' orders and sustained the value.

                            Conclusion:
                            The appeals were partly allowed, with specific relief granted on the valuation of jewellery for the assessment year 1979-80, while other contentions by the assessee were not upheld.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found