Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Unclaimed wages and bonus not taxable under IT Act - ITAT Jaipur decision</h1> The ITAT Jaipur ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that unclaimed wages and bonus were not taxable under section 41(1) of the IT Act, 1961 for the ... - Issues:Determining whether unclaimed wages and unclaimed bonus are taxable under section 41(1) of the IT Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1972-73.Analysis:The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur involved the question of whether unclaimed wages and unclaimed bonus totaling Rs. 16,336 and Rs. 58,091 respectively were taxable under section 41(1) of the IT Act, 1961 for the relevant assessment year. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) and the Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (AAC) had opined that the claims became time-barred and had merged into the company's profits, becoming part of the shareholders' profit.The assessee contended that there was no remission or cessation of liability by the debtor's unilateral act, as the company was obligated to pay the labor under labor laws despite any limitations. The assessee relied on various case laws to support this argument, challenging the findings of the AAC.After considering the arguments and evidence presented, the Member of the Tribunal found that there was no cessation of liability or remission under section 41 of the IT Act, 1961. The Tribunal highlighted that under the law, a debt or liability persists even if its recovery is time-barred. The Member referred to legal precedents to support the position that the mere transfer of an entry by the debtor does not constitute a cessation or remission of liability.Ultimately, the Tribunal held that the findings of the AAC were incorrect, as there was no cessation of liability regarding the unclaimed amounts in question. Therefore, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the additions made to the income for the relevant year. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee.