1976 (1) TMI 55 - AT - Income Tax

Tribunal Adjusts Assessee's Profit Margins

PYARE SINGH. Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER.

The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeals, making adjustments to gross profit margins and sales estimates, acknowledging specific factors ... - Issues Involved:1. Applicability of proviso to sub-section (1) of section 145 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.2. Estimation of sales and gross profit rates for the assessment years 1970-71 and 1971-72.3. Specific factors affecting the gross profit margin for the assessment year 1970-71.4. Gross profit margin in the metal foundry account for the assessment years 1970-71 and 1971-72.5. Disallowance of commission payments and entertainment expenses.6. Charging of interest under sections 139, 215, and 217 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.7. Disallowance of rent and taxes for the assessment year 1971-72.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Applicability of proviso to sub-section (1) of section 145 of the Income Tax Act, 1961:The Income Tax Officer (ITO) applied the provisions of the proviso to sub-section (1) of section 145 due to the assessee's failure to maintain details showing the relationship of output with input and a decline in the gross profit rate. This application was sustained by the Appellate Assistant Commissioner (AAC).2. Estimation of sales and gross profit rates for the assessment years 1970-71 and 1971-72:The ITO estimated the sales and gross profit rates for both years, leading to additions in the assessee's income. The AAC modified these estimates, reducing the gross profit rates and the additions. The Tribunal further adjusted the gross profit margin for the assessment year 1970-71 to 18% but upheld the AAC's rate of 22.5% for the assessment year 1971-72. The Tribunal accepted the sales figures declared by the assessee for both years.3. Specific factors affecting the gross profit margin for the assessment year 1970-71:The assessee argued that certain factors, such as increased raw material costs, higher bonus payments, and commission payments, had depressed the gross profit margin. The Tribunal acknowledged these factors and adjusted the gross profit margin to 18% for the assessment year 1970-71, considering the rate sustained by the Tribunal for the previous year.4. Gross profit margin in the metal foundry account for the assessment years 1970-71 and 1971-72:For the assessment year 1970-71, the Tribunal found the assessee's contention of undertaking a labour contract with Udaipur Cement Works to be correct and deemed the gross profit margin reasonable. The addition made by the ITO was deleted. For the assessment year 1971-72, the Tribunal estimated the gross profit margin at 39% for labour payments from Udaipur Cement Works and 15% for the contract with Bikaner Gypsums.5. Disallowance of commission payments and entertainment expenses:The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of commission payments as the assessee failed to provide evidence of services rendered. However, the disallowance of Rs. 1200 on account of entertainment expenses was deemed unjustified as these expenses were for tea and soft drinks, not entertainment.6. Charging of interest under sections 139, 215, and 217 of the Income Tax Act, 1961:The Tribunal refused to interfere with the charging of interest under these sections as no appeal against such charges is provided by section 246 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.7. Disallowance of rent and taxes for the assessment year 1971-72:The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of Rs. 700 out of rent and taxes as the expenditure did not pertain to the previous year under consideration and was not allowable on a mercantile basis.Conclusion:The assessee's appeals were partly allowed. The Tribunal made adjustments to the gross profit margins and sales estimates, acknowledged specific factors affecting the gross profit, and provided relief on certain disallowances while upholding others.