Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's comp set photo type setter computer was entitled to depreciation at 20% as a computer/data processing machine under item C(3) of sub-Part III of Part I of Appendix I to the Income-tax Rules, 1962, or only at 10% as a general machine.
Analysis: The item was found to have a mini-computer brain, memory, record/playback and editing functions, and to control the full type-setting process up to camera-ready reproduction. Its essential character was therefore that of a computerised printing system rather than an ordinary printing machine or an improved electronic typewriter. The earlier import classification or customs exemption was not treated as decisive for income-tax depreciation, and the broader printing-machine entry was held inapplicable on the facts.
Conclusion: The item fell within the computer/data-processing entry and qualified for depreciation at 20%, not 10%, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The departmental challenge to the depreciation treatment failed, and the allowance of higher depreciation was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: For depreciation purposes, the real character and function of the equipment prevails, and a computerised machine with a mini-computer and data-processing functions is to be classified under the computer/data-processing entry rather than as an ordinary machine.