Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assets dedicated under a wakf could escape wealth-tax on the footing that they vest in the Almighty and therefore fall outside the charging provision, and whether the mutawalli is liable to be assessed as an individual under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.
Analysis: The exemption in section 5(1)(i) was not available. The Court held that although wakf property vests in the Almighty in an ideal sense, that conception does not take the property outside the statutory charge. The expression "individual" in section 3 is confined to a human being, but section 21(1) creates a legal fiction by which the manager or trustee of property held on behalf of another is assessable in the like manner and to the same extent as the person for whose benefit the assets are held. The provision was understood to apply to wakf property, and the later amendment in 1964 merely clarified that it also covers assets held for the benefit of a beneficiary.
Conclusion: The mutawalli is an individual for the purpose of section 3, and the wakf assets are chargeable to wealth-tax. The reference was answered against the assessee and in favour of the department.
Ratio Decidendi: Wakf property, though notionally vested in the Almighty, remains chargeable to wealth-tax, and the mutawalli is assessable under the statutory fiction in section 21(1) as an individual liable to tax under section 3.