Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable where the assessee had maintained regular books of account and the assessment was completed under section 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The returned income and the assessed income differed by more than twenty per cent, but the assessee's books were regularly maintained and there was no finding that they were false or manipulated. The mere fact that the assessment was made under section 144 did not by itself establish concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars. On the facts, no fraud or gross or wilful neglect could be attributed to the assessee so as to attract the Explanation to section 271(1)(c).
Conclusion: Penalty was not leviable and the assessee succeeded on the penalty issue.