Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether expenditure incurred for stamps and registration charges for obtaining overdraft facilities from a bank was an allowable deduction as revenue expenditure under section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
Analysis: The expenditure was incurred to procure overdraft facilities for the assessee's business. Such facilities are ordinarily for a limited period and renewable from time to time, and the outgoing did not bring into existence any asset of an enduring nature. The distinction sought to be drawn between expenditure for entering into the agreement for the first time and expenditure for its renewal was held to be unwarranted. The governing principle was that an expenditure made to obtain the use of money for business purposes, where no express prohibition exists, is deductible in computing taxable income.
Conclusion: The expenditure was held to be wholly laid out for the purposes of the assessee's business and was an allowable deduction.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered in favour of the assessee, and the impugned expenditure was treated as deductible business expenditure rather than capital outlay.
Ratio Decidendi: Expenditure incurred to obtain the use of money for business, including overdraft facilities, is revenue expenditure and deductible unless it results in the acquisition of an enduring asset.