Just a moment...

βœ•
Top
Help
πŸš€ New: Section-Wise Filter βœ•

1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β€” now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available

2. New: β€œIn Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.

Try both these filters in Case Laws β†’

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedbackβœ•

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search βœ•
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
β•³
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
βœ•
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close βœ•
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

        <h1>Tribunal rules in favor of assessee, rejects addition of income. Creditworthiness of cash creditors proven.</h1> The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, deleting the addition of Rs. 48,000 treated as income from other sources. The Tribunal found that the ... - Issues Involved:1. Cash credits of Rs. 48,000 treated as income from other sources.2. Creditworthiness and genuineness of transactions involving Smt. Bilkishbai and Smt. Jubedabai.3. Creditworthiness and genuineness of the transaction involving Smt. Hussainabai.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Cash Credits of Rs. 48,000 Treated as Income from Other Sources:The Income Tax Officer (ITO) treated cash credits of Rs. 48,000 in the names of three persons as income from other sources for the assessment year 1981-82. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] confirmed this addition. The assessee, therefore, filed a second appeal.2. Creditworthiness and Genuineness of Transactions Involving Smt. Bilkishbai and Smt. Jubedabai:The assessee, Shri Ali Hussain, was related to the cash creditors, Smt. Bilkishbai and Smt. Jubedabai. The assessee lent Rs. 20,000 to each of these two ladies, which they repaid on 7th Nov., 1980. The ITO questioned the source of the Rs. 20,000 each lady used to repay the assessee. The assessee explained that the husbands of these ladies had business ventures in Kuwait and maintained Non-resident (External) Accounts with the Bank of Baroda, from which the funds were withdrawn. The ITO and CIT(A) rejected this explanation, doubting the nexus between the withdrawals and the credits, as well as the creditworthiness of the ladies.3. Creditworthiness and Genuineness of the Transaction Involving Smt. Hussainabai:The ITO also questioned the credit of Rs. 5,000 in the name of Smt. Hussainabai, which was repaid to the assessee on 7th April, 1980. The assessee explained that Smt. Hussainabai's husband was a partner in M/s Ibrahim Kala Bhai, and the Rs. 5,000 was given out of her capital. The ITO was not satisfied with this explanation and proposed an addition of Rs. 48,000, which was approved by the Inspecting Assistant Commissioner (IAC).Judgment Analysis:On the Issue of Cash Credits:The Tribunal noted that the tax authorities misapprehended the credits as cash credits under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal emphasized that Section 68 applies to sums credited in the books of an assessee that are capable of being treated as capital or income. In this case, the assessee lent Rs. 40,000 and received the same amount back, which does not constitute a cash credit. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee could not be called upon to explain the creditworthiness of the ladies in this context.On Creditworthiness and Genuineness of Transactions Involving Smt. Bilkishbai and Smt. Jubedabai:The Tribunal found that the withdrawals from the Non-resident (External) Accounts sufficiently explained the creditworthiness of Smt. Bilkishbai and Smt. Jubedabai. The tax authorities had not doubted the identity of the ladies or the existence of the NR(E) accounts. The Tribunal held that the assessee had discharged the onus of proving the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transactions. The Tribunal noted that the tax authorities' suspicion that the withdrawals were spent otherwise was not supported by sufficient evidence.On Creditworthiness and Genuineness of the Transaction Involving Smt. Hussainabai:The Tribunal found that the ITO had distorted the explanation provided by the assessee. The explanation was that the Rs. 5,000 was given out of Smt. Hussainabai's capital, not withdrawn from her husband's firm. The Tribunal observed that the IAC and CIT(A) had erred in their interpretation. Although Smt. Hussainabai was not produced for cross-examination due to illness, the Tribunal found that the assessee should not have been condemned without considering the possibility of examining her on commission.Conclusion:The Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 48,000 and allowed the appeal, concluding that the assessee had established the genuineness and creditworthiness of the transactions.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found