TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT ruling favors Assessee on undisclosed income but upholds addition for exceeding profit limit</h1> <h3>GHANSHYAM NANDKISHORE. Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER.</h3> GHANSHYAM NANDKISHORE. Versus INCOME TAX OFFICER. - TTJ 016, 257, Issues:1. Addition of Rs. 10,000 as income from undisclosed sources.2. Addition of Rs. 5,000 on account of low profit.Analysis:Issue 1: Addition of Rs. 10,000 as income from undisclosed sourcesThe Income Tax Officer (ITO) added Rs. 10,000 as income from undisclosed sources to the Assessee's AOP (Association of Persons). The ITO observed that the AOP consisted of two members who each contributed Rs. 5,000. The Assessee failed to provide an explanation regarding the source of this investment. The ITO considered the amount of Rs. 10,000 as assessable income from undisclosed sources in the hands of the AOP. The Assessee contended that both members had shown this income in their individual returns and that the AOP could not have earned Rs. 10,000 on the very first day of business. However, the AAC upheld the addition, stating that the AOP must explain cash credits in its books. The Appellate Tribunal found merit in the Assessee's arguments, noting that the members had declared the income in their individual returns. Considering the lack of evidence to prove the income belonged to the AOP, the Tribunal deleted the addition of Rs. 10,000.Issue 2: Addition of Rs. 5,000 on account of low profitAnother addition of Rs. 5,000 was made by the ITO on account of low profit in the Assessee's kerosene retail business. The ITO noted that the profit exceeded the permissible limit set by the collector of the area. The AAC sustained this addition, emphasizing that the sales were not verifiable and the profit exceeded the allowed limit. The Assessee argued that the profit rate was fixed by the collector, but the Tribunal agreed with the AAC's decision, stating that the addition of Rs. 5,000 was valid. Therefore, the appeal on this point was rejected, and the overall appeal by the Assessee was partly allowed.In conclusion, the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Indore ruled in favor of the Assessee regarding the addition of Rs. 10,000 as income from undisclosed sources, as there was no substantial evidence to prove the income belonged to the AOP. However, the addition of Rs. 5,000 on account of low profit was upheld, as the profit exceeded the permissible limit set by the collector.
TaxTMI 