TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Upholds Change in Accounting Method for Sales Tax</h1> <h3>INCOME TAX OFFICER. Versus PAPER HOUSE.</h3> INCOME TAX OFFICER. Versus PAPER HOUSE. - TTJ 015, 187, Issues:- Change of method of accounting from cash basis to mercantile for sales tax- Disallowance of sales tax deduction by the ITO- Appeal by the assessee against the ITO's decision- CIT(A)'s consideration of the change in accounting method- Justification of the change by the assessee- Revenue's appeal against CIT(A)'s decision- Upholding of CIT(A)'s decision by the tribunalAnalysis:The case involved the change of accounting method from cash basis to mercantile for sales tax by the assessee. The Income Tax Officer (ITO) disallowed the sales tax deduction claimed by the assessee, stating that the change was made to reduce income. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] considered the change as bona fide and permanent, directing the ITO to recompute the total income of the assessee. The tribunal noted that the change was limited to the sales tax account and found the claim of the assessee to be reasonable, as liability to sales tax arises when transactions are finalized. The tribunal referred to legal precedents stating that sales tax liability is independent of assessment and can be deducted when paid. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing the permanent nature of the change and the acceptance of similar actions in subsequent years by the ITO.The tribunal highlighted that the change in accounting method was justified and proper, especially considering the acceptance of similar actions by the ITO in subsequent years. The tribunal noted that the entire accounting system of the assessee was on a mercantile basis following the change in the sales tax account. The tribunal found no material to contradict the CIT(A)'s observation of the change being bona fide and permanent. Consequently, the tribunal dismissed the appeal by the Revenue, affirming the decision of the CIT(A).In conclusion, the tribunal's decision favored the assessee, emphasizing the legitimacy and permanence of the change in the accounting method for sales tax. The tribunal's analysis relied on legal principles regarding sales tax liability and the independence of such liability from assessment. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, highlighting the consistency of the assessee's actions and the overall shift to a mercantile accounting system.
TaxTMI 