1982 (4) TMI 153 - AT - Wealth-tax

Tribunal upholds AAC decision to delete enhanced profit share in Wealth Tax assessment, dismissing revenue appeal.

The Tribunal upheld the AAC's decision to delete the enhanced share of profit added in the Wealth Tax assessment, dismissing the revenue's appeal. The ... - Issues:1. Deletion of enhanced share of profit added in Wealth Tax assessment.2. Justification for deletion by the AAC.3. Department's attempt to make a new case.4. Comparison of arguments made by both parties.5. Validity of the AAC's decision.Analysis:1. The central issue in the appeal was the deletion of the enhanced share of profit added in the Wealth Tax assessment of the assessee, who was a partner in a firm. The Wealth Tax Officer had added Rs. 2,47,659 to the assessment order based on the increased share of profit allocated to the assessee from the firm M/s Shelly Products. The assessee contended that the addition was unjustified as it pertained to an intangible asset. The AAC relied on a precedent from the Hon'ble Kerala High Court and deleted the addition, leading to the departmental appeal.2. The Department argued that the AAC erred in deleting the addition as the firm's assessment had certain disallowances and a claim for depreciation at a higher rate. The Department contended that even though the asset had been fully depreciated and removed from the balance sheet, it still existed in temporary structures. The Department emphasized the application of r.2B for valuing properties not listed in the balance sheet. However, the Tribunal found that the AAC's decision was justified as the actual existence of the asset was not considered by the WTO.3. The assessee opposed the Department's attempt to introduce a new argument at the appellate stage, maintaining that the WTO's case was distinct and the AAC's decision was valid. The assessee highlighted a previous Tribunal order favoring a similar issue for another partner of the firm. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee, stating that the Department could not change its stance at that stage. It upheld the AAC's decision, emphasizing that the Department could not introduce a new case post-assessment.4. Upon reviewing the arguments and orders, the Tribunal noted that the Department's contentions differed from the WTO's initial stand during assessment. The WTO had merely adopted the enhanced profit share without proper justification. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee's counsel that the Department could not alter its case post-assessment. The Tribunal found that the AAC's deletion of the addition was appropriate as it lacked sufficient supporting evidence. Consequently, the Tribunal upheld the AAC's decision, finding no grounds for interference.5. Ultimately, the Tribunal dismissed the revenue's appeal, affirming the AAC's decision to delete the enhanced share of profit added in the Wealth Tax assessment. The Tribunal concluded that the AAC's order was valid and supported by the reasons provided in the appellate order, thereby upholding the deletion of the addition in question.