Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1994 (5) TMI 56 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Assessment not time-barred for 1982-83, Rs. 27.88 lakhs taxable revenue receipt, partial section 35B deduction allowed. Sales tax deductions for 1985-86. The assessment for the year 1982-83 was found not to be time-barred. The inclusion of Rs. 27.88 lakhs in the fresh assessment was deemed within the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Assessment not time-barred for 1982-83, Rs. 27.88 lakhs taxable revenue receipt, partial section 35B deduction allowed. Sales tax deductions for 1985-86.

                          The assessment for the year 1982-83 was found not to be time-barred. The inclusion of Rs. 27.88 lakhs in the fresh assessment was deemed within the Assessing Officer's jurisdiction. The receipt of Rs. 27.88 lakhs was classified as a revenue receipt and deemed taxable. The claim for weighted deduction under section 35B was partially allowed. Regarding the payment of sales tax for the assessment year 1985-86, deductions were to be allowed if the liability was incurred during the current period.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Time-barred assessment.
                          2. Jurisdiction to include Rs. 27.88 lakhs in the fresh assessment.
                          3. Nature of the receipt of Rs. 27.88 lakhs.
                          4. Claim for weighted deduction under section 35B.
                          5. Payment of sales tax for the assessment year 1985-86.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Time-barred Assessment:
                          The main issue was whether the assessment for the year 1982-83 was time-barred. The assessee filed the original return on 30th June 1982, and a revised return on 7th February 1986. The department claimed an intermediary revised return was filed on 12th February 1985, extending the assessment period to 31st March 1986. The Tribunal found that the intermediary revised return was indeed filed based on the order sheet dated 15-3-1985 and other corroborative evidence. Thus, the assessment completed on 10th February 1986 was within the extended time limit.

                          2. Jurisdiction to Include Rs. 27.88 Lakhs in Fresh Assessment:
                          The assessee argued that the addition of Rs. 27.88 lakhs in the fresh assessment was beyond the scope of the CIT(A)'s directions for de novo assessment. The Tribunal disagreed, stating that the entire assessment was set aside to be completed afresh, and the Assessing Officer was obligated to consider all material, including the audit report. The Tribunal held that the inclusion of Rs. 27.88 lakhs was within the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer.

                          3. Nature of the Receipt of Rs. 27.88 Lakhs:
                          The assessee contended that the receipt of Rs. 27.88 lakhs was a capital receipt, compensating for losses suffered in running the transferred units. The Tribunal found no evidence to support this claim. Instead, it determined that the amount represented interest on the delayed payment of Rs. 72.71 lakhs for the transferred units. The Tribunal concluded that the receipt was a revenue receipt and taxable under section 28(ii)(d) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

                          4. Claim for Weighted Deduction Under Section 35B:
                          The assessee's claim for weighted deduction under section 35B was partly allowed based on a previous Tribunal decision for the assessment year 1981-82. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to ascertain the figures and allow the claim accordingly.

                          5. Payment of Sales Tax for the Assessment Year 1985-86:
                          The assessee claimed deductions for sales tax payments made during the assessment year 1985-86, which related to earlier years. The CIT(A) directed the Assessing Officer to verify the sales tax orders and allow the claim if the liability was incurred during the current accounting period. The Tribunal expanded these directions, stating that if provisions for sales tax in past years were disallowed, the actual payments made during 1985-86 should be allowed.

                          Conclusion:
                          - The assessment for the year 1982-83 was not time-barred.
                          - The inclusion of Rs. 27.88 lakhs in the fresh assessment was within the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer.
                          - The receipt of Rs. 27.88 lakhs was a revenue receipt and taxable.
                          - The claim for weighted deduction under section 35B was partly allowed.
                          - The payment of sales tax for the assessment year 1985-86 should be allowed if the liability was incurred during the current period.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found