Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment was barred by limitation on the basis of the Board's circular and whether the delay in completion of the reopened assessment rendered the assessment invalid.
Analysis: The reopened assessment had remained pending for several years, but the record showed continuous enquiry, repeated hearings, issuance of summons, and repeated requests for adjournment by the assessee, whose firm had been dissolved and whose books were not readily available. The Board's circular prescribing completion of reopened assessments within two years was treated as an administrative direction meant to prevent undue delay. It was not treated as a statutory time bar whose breach would, by itself, make the assessment illegal. The facts were distinguished from cases where long delay was held unreasonable or lacking bona fides, and the delay here was not attributable solely to departmental negligence.
Conclusion: The plea that the reassessment was time barred failed, and the assessment was held to be within jurisdiction.
Ratio Decidendi: A Board circular fixing a normal time frame for completion of reopened assessments is only directory and does not, without more, invalidate an assessment completed after that period, particularly where the delay is explained by continuing proceedings and by the assessee's own conduct.