Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2005 (11) TMI 204 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Grants Partial Deduction for Kakinada & Jamnagar Ports; Reassessment Ordered for Dahej Port Deduction Eligibility. The Tribunal partially upheld the assessee's appeals, granting the deduction under Section 80-IA for profits related to Kakinada Port and Jamnagar Jetty ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal Grants Partial Deduction for Kakinada & Jamnagar Ports; Reassessment Ordered for Dahej Port Deduction Eligibility.

                          The Tribunal partially upheld the assessee's appeals, granting the deduction under Section 80-IA for profits related to Kakinada Port and Jamnagar Jetty Port, directing the AO to compute the allowable deduction. Additionally, the Tribunal instructed the AO to reassess the deduction under Section 33AC for Dahej Port, contingent upon the assessee providing necessary details and establishing the creation of the reserve.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Deduction under Section 80-IA/33AC of the Income Tax Act on income derived from the business of operation and maintenance of ports.
                          2. Eligibility for deduction under Section 80-IA.
                          3. Eligibility for deduction under Section 33AC.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Deduction under Section 80-IA/33AC on income derived from the business of operation and maintenance of ports:
                          The assessee-company, engaged in the business of operation and maintenance of ports, cargo services, and related services, claimed deductions under Section 80-IA for the assessment years 2000-01 and 2001-02. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed these deductions, determining the total income of the assessee at Rs. 2,59,50,240 and Rs. 2,97,17,900 for the respective years after disallowing the claimed deduction under Section 80-IA.

                          2. Eligibility for deduction under Section 80-IA:
                          The AO argued that the assessee did not meet all the conditions under Section 80-IA(4)(i) as it was not involved in the development of any infrastructure facility but only in the maintenance and operation of ports. The AO further noted that the assessee was providing specific services under contractual obligations and not maintaining and operating the entire infrastructure facility. Additionally, the AO contended that the assessee did not have a direct agreement with the Government, which is a requisite condition for claiming the deduction under Section 80-IA.

                          The CIT(A) concurred with the AO, stating that the assessee had not entered into an agreement with the Government and had not transferred the infrastructure facility to the Government, thus not fulfilling the conditions under Section 80-IA. The CIT(A) also raised concerns about the possibility of two entities claiming deductions for the same facility.

                          Tribunal's Findings:
                          The Tribunal noted that the assessee had entered into agreements with developers of ports who had agreements with specified authorities for developing, operating, and maintaining the ports. The Tribunal found that the proviso to Section 80-IA(4)(i) allows for the transfer of the infrastructure facility from the developer to another enterprise for operation and maintenance, and in such cases, the transferee enterprise is eligible for the deduction. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee had complied with the conditions specified under the proviso to Section 80-IA(4)(i) and was entitled to the deduction. The Tribunal directed the AO to compute the deduction allowable under Section 80-IA(4) for the profits pertaining to Kakinada Port and Jamnagar Jetty Port.

                          3. Eligibility for deduction under Section 33AC:
                          The assessee alternatively claimed deduction under Section 33AC for its business of operation of ships. The AO rejected this claim, stating that the assessee's main business was not the operation of ships and that the books of account were not maintained to ascertain the profits derived from the operation of ships. The CIT(A) also denied the deduction, stating that the assessee was a private limited company and not a public company, and that the operation of tugs could not be equated with the operation of ships.

                          Tribunal's Findings:
                          The Tribunal found that the assessee was a public limited company and that tugs are considered ships under the IT Rules and the Merchant Shipping Act, 1958. The Tribunal noted that the assessee had created a reserve as required under Section 33AC and directed the AO to recompute the deduction eligible under Section 33AC in respect of Dahej Port, subject to the assessee providing relevant details and establishing the creation of the reserve.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal partly allowed the appeals of the assessee, granting the deduction under Section 80-IA for Kakinada Port and Jamnagar Jetty Port and directing the AO to recompute the deduction under Section 33AC for Dahej Port.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found