Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2001 (9) TMI 249 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal recalibrates capital gains, instructs Assessing Officer to determine market value pre/post rights issue The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue's appeal by overturning the CIT(A)'s decision and sending the case back to the Assessing Officer for the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                          Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Tribunal recalibrates capital gains, instructs Assessing Officer to determine market value pre/post rights issue

                            The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue's appeal by overturning the CIT(A)'s decision and sending the case back to the Assessing Officer for the recalibration of capital gains. The assessee's cross-objections were dismissed. The Assessing Officer was instructed to determine the market value of shares pre and post rights issue to calculate taxable capital gains. Failure to provide the required details would result in the full consideration of Rs. 63,600 being treated as capital gains.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Deletion of addition towards capital gains.
                            2. Applicability of Supreme Court decisions on capital gains.
                            3. Cost of acquisition for rights to debentures.
                            4. Application of section 55(2)(aa) of the Income-tax Act.
                            5. Computation of capital gains.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Deletion of Addition towards Capital Gains:
                            The Revenue contested the CIT(A)'s deletion of an addition of Rs. 63,600 under the head 'Capital gains'. The assessee had renounced its rights to 240 convertible debentures for a consideration of Rs. 265 each, earning a profit of Rs. 63,600. The CIT(A) accepted the assessee's claim that this amount was not assessable to capital gains tax, citing the Supreme Court's decision in CIT v. B.C. Srinivasa Shetty [1981] 128 ITR 294.

                            2. Applicability of Supreme Court Decisions on Capital Gains:
                            The Revenue argued that the CIT(A) erred in relying on the B.C. Srinivasa Shetty case, which dealt with self-generated assets like goodwill, and instead should have considered the Supreme Court's decisions in CIT v. Dalmia Investment Co. Ltd. [1964] 52 ITR 567 and Miss Dhun Dadabhoy Kapadia v. CIT [1966] 62 ITR 43. The latter decisions pertained to the capital gains on the sale of financial assets and were more relevant to the present case.

                            3. Cost of Acquisition for Rights to Debentures:
                            The core issue was whether the cost of acquisition of the rights to debentures could be ascertained. The CIT(A) held that the rights had no ascertainable cost of acquisition, thus falling under the B.C. Srinivasa Shetty ruling, which exempts such gains from tax. However, the Tribunal noted that rights to debentures are similar to bonus shares, where the cost of acquisition can be determined. The Supreme Court in Dalmia Investment Co. Ltd. provided methods to ascertain the cost of bonus shares, which could be applied to rights to debentures.

                            4. Application of Section 55(2)(aa) of the Income-tax Act:
                            The CIT(A) observed that section 55(2)(aa)(ii), introduced by the Finance Act, 1994, with effect from 1-4-1995, made capital gains on the sale of certain financial assets taxable. However, this provision was not applicable for the assessment year 1991-92. The Tribunal clarified that the insertion of section 55(2)(aa) was to simplify the computation procedure and not to imply that no capital gains tax was exigible before its introduction.

                            5. Computation of Capital Gains:
                            The Tribunal concluded that the decision in B.C. Srinivasa Shetty did not apply to the sale of rights to debentures. Instead, the principles laid down in Miss Dhun Dadabhoy Kapadia, which dealt with the depreciation in the value of original shares due to the issuance of rights, should be applied. The Tribunal remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer to recompute the capital gains by ascertaining the market value of the shares before and after the announcement of the rights issue.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal partly by setting aside the CIT(A)'s order and remitting the case to the Assessing Officer for recomputation of capital gains. The assessee's cross-objections, which merely supported the CIT(A)'s order, were dismissed as redundant. The Assessing Officer was directed to ascertain the market value of the shares before and after the rights issue to determine the capital gains assessable to tax. If the assessee failed to provide the necessary particulars, the entire consideration of Rs. 63,600 would be treated as capital gains.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found