Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1994 (3) TMI 160 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules refining groundnut oil not manufacturing, disallows tax deductions. The tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal (ITA No. 173/Hyd/89), ruling that the conversion of raw groundnut oil into refined oil does not qualify as ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal rules refining groundnut oil not manufacturing, disallows tax deductions.

                          The tribunal dismissed the assessee's appeal (ITA No. 173/Hyd/89), ruling that the conversion of raw groundnut oil into refined oil does not qualify as "manufacture or production" under sections 80HH and 80-I of the Income-tax Act. The tribunal allowed the Revenue's appeal (ITA No. 1232/Hyd/90), overturning the Commissioner (Appeals)'s decision and restoring the Assessing Officer's order disallowing deductions under the specified sections following the Commissioner's order under section 263.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Whether the conversion of raw groundnut oil into refined oil amounts to manufacture or production of an article or thing under sections 80HH and 80-I of the Income-tax Act.
                          2. Whether the order of the Commissioner under section 263 of the Income-tax Act was justified.
                          3. Whether the appeal to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) was maintainable.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Conversion of Raw Groundnut Oil into Refined Oil as Manufacture or Production:
                          The primary issue in the assessee's appeal (ITA No. 173/Hyd/89) was whether the conversion of raw groundnut oil into refined oil constitutes "manufacture or production of an article or thing" under sections 80HH and 80-I of the Income-tax Act. The tribunal examined the nature of the conversion process, which involves neutralizing fat contents, bleaching, and deodorizing the groundnut oil. The tribunal referred to several Supreme Court decisions, including Empire Industries Ltd. v. Union of India and Dy. CST v. Pio Food Packers, to determine the definition of "manufacture." The consistent test applied was whether the process results in a commercially distinct product. The tribunal concluded that refined oil remains groundnut oil, serving the same purpose as a cooking medium, and does not constitute a new article. Therefore, the conversion does not qualify as "manufacture or production" under the relevant sections of the Income-tax Act.

                          2. Justification of the Commissioner's Order under Section 263:
                          The tribunal upheld the Commissioner's order under section 263, which set aside the Assessing Officer's initial assessment allowing deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I. The Commissioner had relied on the Supreme Court decision in Thungabhadra Industries Ltd. v. CTO, which held that the conversion of groundnut oil into refined oil does not constitute manufacture. The tribunal agreed with this interpretation, noting that the refined oil does not lose its basic character as groundnut oil and thus does not qualify for the deductions under the specified sections.

                          3. Maintainability of the Appeal to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals):
                          The Revenue's appeal (ITA No. 1232/Hyd/90) contested the maintainability of the assessee's appeal to the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). The tribunal noted that the Commissioner (Appeals) had relied on the Kerala High Court decision in CIT v. Marwell Sea Foods, which held that certain processing activities amounted to manufacture. However, the tribunal found that this decision was not directly applicable to the facts of the case at hand. Given the Supreme Court's ruling in Thungabhadra Industries Ltd., the tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in concluding that the conversion of groundnut oil into refined oil amounted to manufacture. Consequently, the tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order and restored the Assessing Officer's order, which had given effect to the Commissioner's order under section 263.

                          Conclusion:
                          - Assessee's Appeal (ITA No. 173/Hyd/89): Dismissed. The tribunal found no merit in the claim that the conversion of raw groundnut oil into refined oil constitutes manufacture or production under sections 80HH and 80-I.
                          - Revenue's Appeal (ITA No. 1232/Hyd/90): Allowed. The tribunal held that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in his interpretation and restored the Assessing Officer's order, which had disallowed the deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I following the Commissioner's order under section 263.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found