Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether debts outstanding from the deceased and repayments made within two years before death could be brought within section 46 of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 on the footing that the creditors had earlier received settled property from the deceased.
Analysis: The provision applies only where there is a sufficient nexus between the debt or repayment and the property derived from the deceased. The existence of gifted property in the hands of the donees is not enough by itself; the relevant consideration must consist of property derived from the deceased, and any abatement is confined to that part of the consideration so derived. On the facts, the amounts advanced to the deceased were found to have been sourced substantially from the donees' own resources and money-lending activities, with no real connection to the settled agricultural lands, and the repayments likewise lacked the requisite link to the gifted property.
Conclusion: The additions under section 46 were not sustainable and the deletion made by the first appellate authority was upheld.