Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the three co-purchasers constituted an association of persons for the purpose of assessment of the surplus on sale of the land, and whether assessment on the association was barred after one member had already been assessed on her share.
Analysis: The purchase deed recorded the respective contributions of the parties and showed that the consideration came from separate funds, with one co-purchaser having a half share and the other two having equal shares in the remaining interest. The land was held without improvement and was later sold on the basis of the same defined shares, with sale consideration received pro rata and separately. On these facts, there was no evidence of a common adventure or of persons coming together as a unit to earn income, and a common purchase deed or common sale deed alone was insufficient to create an association of persons. Further, one member had already been assessed on full disclosure of the relevant facts, and that earlier assessment precluded a fresh assessment on the association.
Conclusion: The co-purchasers did not constitute an association of persons, and the attempted assessment on the association was not sustainable; the revenue's appeal failed.
Final Conclusion: Separate contributions to purchase consideration and separate entitlement to sale proceeds prevented the formation of an association of persons, and the prior assessment of a member barred assessment on the alleged association.
Ratio Decidendi: Where co-owners acquire and dispose of property in proportion to separately contributed funds and receive sale proceeds pro rata without combining as a unit, no association of persons is formed; an assessment on the association is also not maintainable after one member has already been assessed on the same disclosed facts.