Ascertainable beneficial interests under wealth tax determine what trustees can be assessed on, while a mere licence to wear jewellery is not property.

A mere permissive right to wear jewellery was treated as non-proprietary and not an asset within the Wealth-tax Act, so it could not be assessed in the trustees' hands under section 21(1). Once the jewellery was sold, however, the beneficiaries' monetary and income-yielding entitlements, including the pocket-money and housing fund interests, became ascertainable beneficial interests capable of valuation and inclusion in net wealth under section 21(1). The remainder beneficiaries' interests were also found to be determinate because their identity and shares were ascertainable on the valuation date, making section 21(4) inapplicable. The discussion concludes that only ascertainable beneficial interests are taxable in trustees' hands.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether the life beneficiaries' right to wear the jewellery was an asset liable to wealth-tax under section 21(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957; (ii) whether the converted monetary entitlement arising from sale of the jewellery and the pocket-money and housing fund interests were assessable in the trustees' hands under section 21(1); and (iii) whether the remainder beneficiaries' interests were indeterminate so as to attract section 21(4).

Issue (i): Whether the life beneficiaries' right to wear the jewellery was an asset liable to wealth-tax under section 21(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.

Analysis: The right to wear and use the jewellery was held to be merely permissive and not proprietary in nature. A mere licence to wear jewellery does not amount to "property" or an asset within section 2(e) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957. On that footing, the trustees could not be assessed under section 21(1) on the value attributable only to the unconverted right to wear the jewellery.

Conclusion: The right to wear the jewellery was not taxable as an asset in the trustees' hands under section 21(1).

Issue (ii): Whether the converted monetary entitlement arising from sale of the jewellery and the pocket-money and housing fund interests were assessable in the trustees' hands under section 21(1).

Analysis: Once the jewellery was sold, the beneficiaries' entitlement was transformed into an income-yielding and enforceable monetary interest with proprietary enjoyment. Likewise, the pocket-money fund became payable after attainment of the specified age, and the housing fund generated a present right to income upon marriage until residential provision was made. These interests had ascertainable value on the relevant valuation dates and were therefore capable of inclusion in net wealth. The capitalised value of such beneficial interests was assessable in the trustees' hands under section 21(1), with valuation to be made in the manner prescribed under the Wealth-tax Rules, 1958.

Conclusion: The monetary and income-yielding interests were taxable in the trustees' hands under section 21(1) to the extent of the beneficiaries' beneficial interests.

Issue (iii): Whether the remainder beneficiaries' interests were indeterminate so as to attract section 21(4).

Analysis: The trust deed provided for identifiable remainder beneficiaries and ascertainable shares on the relevant valuation dates on the hypothesis of the prior life interests having ended. Future contingencies did not render the shares indeterminate where the beneficiaries and their proportions could be determined on the valuation date. Section 21(1), and not section 21(4), therefore governed the remainder interests.

Conclusion: The remainder beneficiaries' interests were determinate, and section 21(4) was inapplicable.

Final Conclusion: The assessments were sustained only to the extent of the beneficiaries' ascertainable beneficial interests, while the contrary direction to assess the trust under section 21(4) was set aside, resulting in a partial success for the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: Under section 21 of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, only the value of a beneficiary's ascertainable beneficial interest can be taxed in the hands of trustees, a mere permissive right to wear jewellery is not an "asset," and section 21(4) applies only where the beneficiaries or their shares are indeterminate on the relevant valuation date.

---