Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the fees payable to a non-resident consultant for analysing and testing samples and sending reports constituted fees for technical services and were deemed to accrue or arise in India; and (ii) what rate of tax was applicable for deduction at source.
Analysis: The services fell within the definition of fees for technical services because they were managerial, technical or consultancy services and did not relate to a construction, assembly, mining or like project undertaken by the recipient. The exclusion in section 9(1)(vii)(b) did not apply because the services were not utilised in a business or profession carried on outside India and were not for earning income from a source outside India. The reports were used in the applicant's business in India, so the income was deemed to accrue or arise in India and section 195 was attracted. For the rate of tax, the applicable deduction was to be determined by comparing the domestic rate in the Finance Act with the treaty rate under Article 12, and the more beneficial rate would apply.
Conclusion: (i) Yes, the services were rendered in India and the consideration was taxable as fees for technical services deemed to accrue or arise in India, against the assessee; and (ii) the tax deductible at source would be at the lower of the domestic rate or the treaty rate, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The advance ruling held that the consultancy payments were taxable in India as fees for technical services, while the withholding rate had to be applied at the more beneficial of the domestic and treaty rates.
Ratio Decidendi: Where technical or consultancy services of a non-resident are utilised in an assessee's business in India, the consideration is deemed to accrue or arise in India under section 9(1)(vii)(b), and treaty protection extends only to the extent the applicable treaty rate is more beneficial.