Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the income or loss arising from the inherited estate of the deceased was assessable in the assessee's individual hands as legal heir, or could be excluded on the footing that the estate was separately assessable until actual distribution.
Analysis: The assessee, being one of the legal heirs, acquired an immediate vested interest in the deceased's estate on intestate succession. The fact that the assets and liabilities of the estate had not been fully ascertained or distributed did not postpone vesting in the heirs. The existence of liabilities exceeding assets did not justify excluding the inherited income or loss from the assessee's assessment. Such income or loss, if arising from the inherited assets and liabilities, had to be considered in the hands of the legal heir unless the facts showed that the heirs had carried on a joint enterprise as an Association of Persons in relation to the legacy. The question whether the estate was being worked as an AOP and the totality of the legacy therefore required factual reconsideration by the assessing authority.
Conclusion: The assessee's contention was accepted, the contrary view of the lower authorities was set aside, and the matter was remitted for fresh determination in accordance with law.