Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal Rules Assessment Invalid Post-Amalgamation Dissolution; Dismisses Related Appeals and Objections as Moot.</h1> <h3>Modi Corporation Limited. Versus Joint Commissioner Of Income-tax. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax. Versus Calcutta Instalments (P) Limited.</h3> The Tribunal declared the assessment on M/s Calcutta Instalments (P) Ltd. invalid due to its dissolution following amalgamation, rendering the assessment ... Validity of assessment - whether after dissolution of a company and after the intimation of such dissolution with the RoC, an assessment can be made on a dissolved company - HELD THAT:- Following the decision of CIT VS. Express Newspapers Ltd.[1960 (3) TMI 48 - MADRAS HIGH COURT], it is clear that the assessment made in the present case in the name of M/s Calcutta Instalments Company (P) Ltd. after the date of its dissolution was not valid. The fact that this company filed a return of income is not of any consequence. The assessment is, therefore, held to be invalid and is cancelled. Thus, the assessment is null and void, all the other issues raised in the assessee's appeal as well as its cross-objection and the grounds raised by Revenue in both its appeals do not call for any adjudication. They are, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. In the result ITA No. 211/Del/2001 is allowed and all the other appeals and the cross-objection are dismissed. Issues Involved:1. Validity of assessment on a dissolved company.2. Various additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) and their subsequent adjudication by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)].3. Cross-objections raised by the assessee regarding non-adjudication of a ground of appeal by the CIT(A).Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Validity of Assessment on a Dissolved Company:The primary issue was whether the assessment made by the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Jt. CIT) on M/s Calcutta Instalments (P) Ltd., which was dissolved on 16th May 1996, was valid. The assessee argued that the assessment was null and void as the company ceased to exist following its amalgamation with Modifin (P) Ltd. This amalgamation was sanctioned by the Allahabad High Court on 11th October 1996, and the Delhi High Court on 10th December 1996 for related companies. The court orders stipulated that all properties, rights, liabilities, and proceedings of the transferor companies be transferred to the transferee company, and the transferor companies be dissolved without winding up from 16th May 1996. Despite this, the AO proceeded with the assessment, leading to the assessee's appeal.The Tribunal referred to several precedents, including Birla Cotton Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd. vs. CIT, Saraswati Ind. Syndicate Ltd. vs. CIT, and Singer India Ltd. vs. Chander Mohan Chadha & Ors., which established that an amalgamating company ceases to exist upon amalgamation. They also cited decisions like CIT vs. Express Newspapers Ltd. and Impsat (P) Ltd. vs. ITO, which held that an assessment on a non-existent entity is invalid. The Tribunal concluded that the assessment made on M/s Calcutta Instalments (P) Ltd. after its dissolution was invalid and canceled it.2. Various Additions Made by the AO:The AO had made several additions to the income returned by the assessee, leading to a total assessed income of Rs. 2,13,23,530. The CIT(A) deleted some of these additions but upheld others. The assessee challenged the sustained additions, while the Revenue appealed against the deletions. However, since the Tribunal found the assessment itself to be invalid, it did not adjudicate on these additions, deeming them infructuous.3. Cross-Objections by the Assessee:The assessee also raised cross-objections regarding the CIT(A)'s failure to adjudicate a ground of appeal and questioned the validity of the assessment on the dissolved company. Given the Tribunal's decision that the assessment was null and void, these cross-objections were rendered moot and were dismissed as infructuous.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal (ITA No. 211/Del/2001), declaring the assessment invalid due to the dissolution of M/s Calcutta Instalments (P) Ltd. All other appeals and cross-objections were dismissed as infructuous.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found