Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for computing reduction in rebate under Paragraph D of Part II of the First Schedule to the Finance Act, 1958, the composition of profits and gains to be considered is that of the previous year in which dividends were distributed or of earlier years from which the dividends were actually declared.
Analysis: The relevant clause in the Explanation to Paragraph D creates a statutory fiction for deeming the amount of dividends distributed. The language confines the computation to the total income and the profits and gains of the previous year, as shown by the repeated references to "the previous year" and "for that year". The fiction cannot be extended beyond the limits of the statutory words, and the profits of prior years, even if they formed the source of distribution, are not the basis for the rebate computation under the clause.
Conclusion: The previous year alone had to be taken into account for computing the reduction in rebate, and not the years prior to it. The answer to the first question was therefore against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.