Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether non-allowance of the statutory exemption under section 33(1)(n) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, though not claimed in the return, constituted a mistake apparent from the record rectifiable under section 61 of that Act.
Analysis: The deceased's half share in the residential house was already on record and accepted in the assessment, but the exemption was omitted because no express claim had been made in the return. The omission was treated as an overlook of a mandatory statutory provision rather than a matter of discretion. A rectification provision was held capable of correcting such an apparent error, and where two views were possible the one favourable to the citizen was preferred. The assessment authority was therefore required to examine the exemption claim on the recorded facts and, if necessary, obtain further material before refusing relief.
Conclusion: The omission to consider section 33(1)(n) was a rectifiable mistake under section 61, and the matter had to be reconsidered by the assessing authority.