Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, for valuation under section 7(2)(a) of the Wealth-tax Act, the written down value of depreciable assets under the Income-tax Act could be substituted for the balance-sheet value on the ground that adequate depreciation had not been provided because of paucity of profits.
Analysis: Section 7(2)(a) permits the Wealth-tax Officer to determine the net value of business assets with reference to the balance-sheet, but only after making such adjustments as the circumstances require. The balance-sheet figure is not conclusive, yet the assessee bears the burden of producing reliable material to show that the figure shown is not the true value on the valuation date. A mere assertion that depreciation could not be fully provided for because profits were insufficient does not, by itself, establish that the written down value represents the real value of the assets. The assessee must further show that the balance-sheet value is artificially inflated and that the written down value is in fact the proper value for wealth-tax purposes.
Conclusion: The written down value could not be automatically substituted for the balance-sheet value. The question was answered in the negative, against the assessee and in favour of the revenue.