2004 (10) TMI 286 - AT - Income Tax

Tribunal upholds CIT(A) decision on ship dismantling company's sales discrepancies, remands interest disallowance issue

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to sustain the addition of Rs. 50,000 in the case involving discrepancies in recorded sales of furnace oil by a ... Manufacture Or Production , Additions to income Issues Involved:1. Addition of Rs. 50,000 sustained by CIT(A).2. Classification of ship-breaking activity as an industrial undertaking eligible for deductions under ss. 80HH and 80-I.3. Disallowance of interest of Rs. 23,02,796 under s. 40(a)(i).4. Reduction of addition on account of unaccounted sale of LDO, Furnace oil, and lubricant oil.5. Deletion of addition of Rs. 50,000 on account of disallowance of expenditure on consumables and other expenses.Detailed Analysis:1. Addition of Rs. 50,000 Sustained by CIT(A):- Facts: The assessee, a company engaged in ship dismantling, was found to have discrepancies in the recorded sale and stock of furnace oil, leading the AO to add Rs. 2,00,000 as income from unaccounted sales. The CIT(A) reduced this addition to Rs. 50,000.- Decision: The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, emphasizing the practical view taken by the CIT(A) and the need for some addition due to the general nature of the assessee's explanation. Both the assessee's and Revenue's appeals on this ground were dismissed.2. Classification of Ship-Breaking Activity as an Industrial Undertaking:- Facts: The Revenue challenged the CIT(A)'s decision that ship-breaking is an industrial undertaking eligible for deductions under ss. 80HH and 80-I.- Contrary Views: The Bombay High Court in Ship Scrap Traders held that ship-breaking qualifies as an industrial undertaking, while the Gujarat High Court in Vijay Ship Breaking Corporation held the opposite.- Decision: The Tribunal opted to follow the Bombay High Court's decision, citing the principle of beneficial interpretation in fiscal enactments. The order of the CIT(A) was upheld, and the Revenue's appeals on this ground were dismissed.3. Disallowance of Interest of Rs. 23,02,796 Under s. 40(a)(i):- Facts: The AO disallowed the interest paid to foreign sellers due to non-deduction of tax at source. The CIT(A) deleted the disallowance, treating the amount as part of the purchase price.- Decision: The Tribunal noted that the interest paid by the assessee could be exempt under s. 10(15)(iv)(c) if approved by the Central Government. The Tribunal remanded the issue to the AO for fresh consideration in light of the approval dated 3rd Nov., 2003, and the amended provisions of the Act. The CIT(A)'s basis for considering the sum as part of the purchase price was rejected.4. Reduction of Addition on Account of Unaccounted Sale of LDO, Furnace Oil, and Lubricant Oil:- Facts: The AO made additions for unaccounted sales, which the CIT(A) reduced.- Decision: The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's grounds, aligning with the reasons given for the 1994-95 assessment year.5. Deletion of Addition of Rs. 50,000 on Account of Disallowance of Expenditure on Consumables and Other Expenses:- Facts: The AO disallowed Rs. 50,000 due to higher claimed expenditures compared to the previous year despite lower sales, which the CIT(A) deleted.- Decision: The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, consistent with its reasoning for the 1994-95 assessment year.Conclusion:- ITA No. 2876/Del/1998 is dismissed.- ITA No. 3118/Del/1998 is partly allowed for statistical purposes.- ITA Nos. 5365/Del/1998 and 4011/Del/1999 are dismissed.