Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amounts paid to the Danish company for carrying out studies and tests were taxable in India as royalty or remuneration for personal services, or whether they constituted commercial profits not chargeable in India in the absence of a permanent establishment.
Analysis: The payments were held to be in the nature of technical fees and not royalty, since there was no transfer of technical know-how or right to use any property or asset of the foreign company. On the materials then available, such receipts would ordinarily fall within commercial profits of the foreign enterprise. The applicability of the relevant double taxation agreement and the Board's circular on the treatment of technical fees required consideration of materials and clarifications not examined by the lower authority.
Conclusion: The characterization adopted by the lower authority was not accepted in full, and the matter was sent back for reconsideration of the Board's clarifications and a fresh decision after hearing the parties.