TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT allows appeal on valuation principles for unquoted shares, cites legal precedents</h1> <h3>Smt. Sarla Jain. Versus Inspecting Assistant Commissioner</h3> Smt. Sarla Jain. Versus Inspecting Assistant Commissioner - ITD 021, 137, Issues:1. Revision of wealth tax return and assessment by the Commissioner under section 25(2) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957.2. Applicability of rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules, 1957 in valuation of shares.3. Judicial interpretation of valuation methods for unquoted shares.4. Application of High Court's ruling in a similar case to the present assessment.Analysis:1. The case involved the revision of a wealth tax return by the assessee, leading to an assessment by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Delhi-D. The Commissioner, under section 25(2) of the Wealth-tax Act, set aside the assessment as erroneous and prejudicial to revenue due to valuation discrepancies in shares held by the assessee.2. The main contention was the applicability of rule 1D of the Wealth-tax Rules in valuing shares. The Commissioner argued that shares should have been valued under rule 1D instead of the yield method. The assessee, relying on various legal precedents, contested this argument.3. The ITAT considered the judicial interpretation of valuation methods for unquoted shares, particularly emphasizing the application of section 7(1) of the Act read with rule 1D, and the use of the yield method endorsed by Supreme Court decisions in similar cases.4. Referring to a judgment by the Delhi High Court in a similar case, the ITAT concluded that the valuation date discrepancy between the assessee and the companies in question rendered rule 1D as directory, not mandatory. The High Court's ruling guided the ITAT to uphold the assessee's valuation method based on Supreme Court precedents, leading to the cancellation of the Commissioner's order and restoration of the original assessment.In summary, the ITAT allowed the appeal by the assessee, emphasizing the correct application of valuation principles for unquoted shares and the adherence to legal precedents established by the Supreme Court and the High Court in similar cases.
TaxTMI 