Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Appellant's Challenge to Surcharge Under Finance Act, 1963 Upheld</h1> <h3>Madurai District Central Co-operative Bank Limited Versus Third Income-Tax Officer, Madurai</h3> Madurai District Central Co-operative Bank Limited Versus Third Income-Tax Officer, Madurai - [1975] 101 ITR 24 (SC), 1975 AIR 2016, 1976 (1) SCR 136, ... Issues Involved:1. Validity of additional surcharge levied on residual income.2. Interpretation of relevant provisions of the Finance Act, 1963.3. Legislative competence of Parliament to impose a new charge through the Finance Act.4. Relationship between sections 81(i)(a) and 99(1)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the Finance Act, 1963.5. Scope and nature of surcharges under the Finance Act, 1963.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Validity of Additional Surcharge Levied on Residual Income:The appellant contested the imposition of an additional surcharge on its residual income, arguing that its taxable income was only Rs. 51,763, yet a tax of Rs. 76,674.07 was imposed. The appellant claimed that the relevant provisions of the Finance Act were invalid as they subjected exempt income to additional surcharge, which was intended as an additional levy on income-tax and had no independent existence apart from it. The court, however, upheld the High Court's decision, affirming that the additional surcharge was validly imposed on the residual income as defined under the Finance Act, 1963.2. Interpretation of Relevant Provisions of the Finance Act, 1963:The court analyzed sections 2(1)(a), 2(8), and 3 of the Finance Act, 1963, along with Paragraph A(ii) of Part I of the First Schedule, and clause (c) of the portion called 'Surcharges on income-tax.' It was determined that the additional surcharge is a distinct charge, not dependent on the assessee's liability to pay income-tax or super-tax. The additional surcharge is calculated on the residual income, which is the total income reduced by capital gains and the amount of tax that would have been chargeable if no part of the income had been exempt from tax.3. Legislative Competence of Parliament to Impose a New Charge through the Finance Act:The court affirmed Parliament's competence to introduce a new charge through a Finance Act, as per Article 246(1) of the Constitution, which grants Parliament exclusive power to make laws on matters in List I of the Seventh Schedule, including 'taxes on income other than agricultural income.' The court noted that the legislative competence of Parliament is not limited by the form or manner in which the power is exercised, allowing for the introduction of new charges either in the Income-tax Act or the Finance Act.4. Relationship between Sections 81(i)(a) and 99(1)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the Finance Act, 1963:Sections 81(i)(a) and 99(1)(v) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, provide exemptions from income-tax and super-tax for co-operative societies engaged in banking. However, the Finance Act, 1963, introduces a new charge, the additional surcharge, which is calculated on the residual income. The court clarified that the additional surcharge is not levied on the exempt business income but on the residual income, which includes non-business income and is computed after certain reductions.5. Scope and Nature of Surcharges under the Finance Act, 1963:The court discussed the nature of surcharges, referring to the case of Commissioner of Income-tax v. K. Srinivasan, which established that 'income-tax' includes surcharges. The court concluded that the additional surcharge under the Finance Act, 1963, is a distinct charge levied for the purposes of the Union, as per Article 271 of the Constitution, and is calculated on the residual income. The court rejected the appellant's argument that the levy of additional surcharge is dependent on the liability to pay income-tax, emphasizing that the additional surcharge is an independent charge.Conclusion:The court upheld the High Court's judgment, confirming the validity of the additional surcharge levied on the appellant's residual income. The court concluded that the Finance Act, 1963, validly introduced a new charge, the additional surcharge, which is distinct from income-tax and is calculated on the residual income, thereby affirming Parliament's legislative competence to impose such a charge.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found