TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether cash assistance and duty drawback received by the exporter but passed on to the manufacturers/suppliers under the contractual arrangement were includible in the assessee's income. (ii) Whether the assessee's cross-objection challenging the taxability in law of the cash assistance amount had merit.
Issue (i): Whether cash assistance and duty drawback received by the exporter but passed on to the manufacturers/suppliers under the contractual arrangement were includible in the assessee's income.
Analysis: The contractual clauses showed that export entitlements, including cash assistance, duty drawback and replenishment benefits, were to accrue to the manufacturers/suppliers and that the exporter had no beneficial interest in them. The contemporaneous clarifications from export authorities supported the view that such export incentives could be claimed and passed on in the manner agreed between the parties. The arrangements were held not to offend public policy and the transferred amounts were treated as diverted at source rather than as income retained by the exporter. The cited authorities on application of income were distinguished on the facts.
Conclusion: The transferred cash assistance and duty drawback were excluded from the assessee's income, and this issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the assessee's cross-objection challenging the taxability in law of the cash assistance amount had merit.
Analysis: The assessee itself had offered the amount as income, and no inadvertence or mistake was shown. The retrospective amendments to the definition of income and business receipts brought the amount within the taxable net. On that basis, the legal ground raised in the cross-objection was not accepted.
Conclusion: The cross-objection failed and this issue was decided against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The substantive relief on transferred export incentives was upheld, but the assessee's independent challenge to taxability did not succeed; accordingly, both the departmental appeal and the cross-objection were dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where export incentives are contractually diverted to manufacturers/suppliers under a binding arrangement, and the arrangement is supported by the governing export policy, the amounts so diverted are not part of the exporter's taxable income; a separate challenge fails where the amount was voluntarily offered as income and later brought within the charging provisions by retrospective amendment.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
