Appeal Granted: Unabsorbed Depreciation Setoff Allowed, Creditor Addition Disallowed, Mandatory Interest Charging Cited.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee on all three grounds. It permitted the setting off of unabsorbed depreciation against short-term capital gains for the assessment year 1997-98, disallowed the addition of an unmoved creditor amount to the assessee's income, and noted the mandatory nature of charging interest under section 234B.

---

---

Issues involved:
The judgment addresses the following issues:
1. Disallowance of setting off unabsorbed depreciation against short-term capital gain.
2. Addition of unmoved creditor amount to the income of the assessee.
3. Charging of interest under section 234B of the Act.

Issue 1: Disallowance of setting off unabsorbed depreciation against short-term capital gain:
The appellant, a company engaged in the business of industrial and medical gases, claimed setting off of unabsorbed depreciation against short-term capital gains. The Assessing Officer disallowed the claim based on the amendment to section 32(2) by the Finance Act of 1996. The CIT(A) upheld the disallowance, leading to the appeal. The appellant argued that the unabsorbed depreciation could be set off against any income under any head for the assessment year 1997-98. The Tribunal, considering the relevant provisions and precedents, held that the appellant was entitled to set off the unabsorbed depreciation against any income for the assessment year 1997-98, in line with the circular issued by the CBDT. The appeal on this ground was allowed.

Issue 2: Addition of unmoved creditor amount to the income of the assessee:
The Assessing Officer added an amount representing an unmoved creditor balance to the income of the assessee, as it remained outstanding for over three years. The CIT(A) upheld this addition, stating that the liability was not intended to be paid off. The appellant contended that the liability existed due to a dispute with the supplier, supported by documentary evidence. The Tribunal observed that the Revenue failed to prove the cessation of liability, especially in the absence of evidence that the supplier had given up the claim. As the liability was shown in the balance sheet and the supplier had not abandoned the claim, the Tribunal held in favor of the assessee, disallowing the addition.

Issue 3: Charging of interest under section 234B of the Act:
The issue of charging interest under section 234B was deemed mandatory and consequential in nature, without further elaboration in the judgment.

In conclusion, the Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee on all three grounds, setting aside the disallowances and additions made by the lower authorities.

---