Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether there was a valid assessment on the deceased partner of a firm after the firm had been dissolved, and whether the widow could be denied a tax clearance certificate on the basis of that alleged tax liability.
Analysis: The assessment was made long after the partnership had come to an end and the firm was no longer in existence. In those circumstances, the remaining partner could not be treated as an agent of the deceased partner for assessment purposes, and notice served on him could not amount to notice to the deceased partner. The assessment was also made on a non-existing firm without notice to the person interested in the liability. On these facts, the assessment could not be treated as valid against the deceased partner.
Conclusion: There was no valid assessment on the deceased partner, and the widow was not liable to discharge the alleged tax liability or be refused the tax clearance certificate on that basis.