Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Tools

We've upgraded AI Tools on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Tools

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1985 (10) TMI 128 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal Reduces Disallowed Expenses, Confirms Industrial Status The Tribunal reduced the disallowance of Travelling and Conveyance Expenses for the assessee from Rs. 61,846 to Rs. 19,000, finding most expenses ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              Tribunal Reduces Disallowed Expenses, Confirms Industrial Status

                              The Tribunal reduced the disallowance of Travelling and Conveyance Expenses for the assessee from Rs. 61,846 to Rs. 19,000, finding most expenses admissible. It also confirmed the assessee's status as an Industrial Company based on precedent, rejecting the CIT's proposed questions. A dissenting opinion on the second issue led to referral to the Senior Vice-President, who ultimately agreed that the issue was not referable. The matter was returned to the original Bench, denying the CIT's reference application.




                              Issues Involved:
                              1. Disallowance of Travelling and Conveyance Expenses.
                              2. Status of the Assessee-Company as an Industrial Company.

                              Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

                              1. Disallowance of Travelling and Conveyance Expenses:

                              The primary issue addressed was whether the ITAT was correct in reducing the disallowance under the head "Travelling and Conveyance Expenses" from Rs. 61,846 to Rs. 19,000. The Tribunal examined the details of the expenses claimed by the assessee, which included Rs. 45,862 for conveyance expenses, Rs. 25,450 for car repairs, and Rs. 3,414 for travelling. The Tribunal found that the assessee's business activities had not significantly decreased, contrary to the findings of the lower authorities. This conclusion was based on the examination of the assessee's balance sheet and notes submitted during the appellate proceedings. The Tribunal determined that the lower authorities were incorrect in holding that the assessee's business activities were nominal during the assessment year 1977-78. Upon further examination, the Tribunal found that the expenses claimed were largely admissible, except for a few items. The Tribunal also considered the decision from the assessment year 1978-79, where 25% of the expenses were deemed inadmissible. Consequently, the Tribunal estimated that Rs. 19,000 of the expenses were inadmissible, rejecting the CIT's proposed question as it was deemed a pure finding of fact.

                              2. Status of the Assessee-Company as an Industrial Company:

                              The second issue was whether the ITAT was correct in directing that the assessee-company be treated as an Industrial Company by following the order in the case of ITO vs. Hydle Construction Pvt. Ltd. The Tribunal noted that the Department had accepted the decision of the Special Bench in the Hydle Constructions case and had not sought a reference on that decision. The Tribunal requested the Departmental Representative to confirm this acceptance, but no information was provided. Consequently, the Tribunal accepted the statement made by the respondent's counsel that the Department had accepted the decision, thus concluding that the second question proposed by the CIT did not constitute a referable question of law.

                              Separate Judgments Delivered:

                              Dissenting Opinion:

                              One member, S.S. Mehra, J., disagreed with the majority opinion on the second issue. While agreeing that question No. 1 was rightly declined, he believed that question No. 2 was a reasonable question of law and warranted a reference. This difference of opinion led to the matter being referred to the Senior Vice-President under section 255(4) of the IT Act.

                              Third Member's Opinion:

                              G. Krishnamurthy, Senior Vice-President, was appointed as the Third Member to resolve the difference of opinion. He concluded that question No. 2 was not a referable question of law. He emphasized that the Department had accepted the Special Bench's decision in the Hydle Constructions case, which established the principle that a construction company engaged in constructing multi-storeyed buildings qualifies as an industrial company. Since the Department had not disputed this principle, there was no subsisting dispute requiring the High Court's opinion. Thus, he agreed with the Accountant Member's view that question No. 2 ceased to be a referable question of law.

                              Final Decision:

                              The matter was sent back to the original Bench for disposal according to the majority opinion, ultimately rejecting the reference application filed by the CIT.
                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found