Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether wealth-tax paid on closely-held companies under section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983 was wealth-tax chargeable under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 so as to be disallowable under section 40(a)(iia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Section 40(1) of the Finance Act, 1983 expressly provides that wealth-tax shall be charged under the Wealth-tax Act, and section 40(7) directs that the section be construed as one with the Wealth-tax Act. The levy is therefore not an independent tax outside the Wealth-tax Act, but a revived levy under that Act with modified machinery and incidence. On that construction, the payment falls within the expression "wealth-tax" in section 40(a)(iia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The authorities relied upon by the assessee were held distinguishable because they turned on materially different statutory language.
Conclusion: The wealth-tax levied under section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983 was held to be wealth-tax chargeable under the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, and the deduction was correctly disallowed under section 40(a)(iia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.