Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, in computing the income from the IDA contract under the Indo-French treaty, depreciation on the rig had to be allowed under the Income-tax Act, 1961, or only on the basis of wear and tear under the treaty.
Analysis: The treaty did not define written down value or prescribe a special method for computing depreciation. Article II provided that undefined terms in the agreement would take their meaning from the domestic law of the contracting State. Article III required allowance of all reasonable deductions in determining industrial or commercial profits. The treaty's non-discrimination clause also supported equal treatment of a foreign enterprise with a resident taxpayer. The decision was reinforced by the CBDT circular and by section 90(2), which permits application of the more beneficial provisions of the Income-tax Act to a treaty assessee. In that setting, depreciation under the Act was treated as a permissible deduction while computing the treaty income.
Conclusion: Depreciation was required to be computed and allowed under the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the assessee's claim was accepted.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a tax treaty does not prescribe a specific method for computing depreciation, and its terms direct undefined expressions to domestic law, depreciation is to be determined under the Income-tax Act if that regime is more beneficial to the assessee.