Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Income-tax Officer had jurisdiction under section 35(5) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 to rectify the assessment of a partner where the firm's original assessment was completed before 1 April 1952 but a reassessment of the firm was made after that date.
Analysis: The provision in section 35(5) was treated as a substantive enactment affecting vested rights and not as a merely declaratory or procedural change. On the facts, the case fell within the principle that the power of rectification under that clause could not be exercised where the firm's assessment had been completed before the material date. The earlier decision extending the contrary view to a case based on reassessment was not accepted as controlling in the present factual setting, and the High Court's approach could not stand.
Conclusion: The rectification under section 35(5) was within jurisdiction and the challenge to the assessment failed.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was liable to be dismissed and the Revenue's appeal succeeded.
Ratio Decidendi: Section 35(5) of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 did not authorise rectification of a partner's assessment where the firm's assessment had been completed before 1 April 1952, and the provision could not be applied retrospectively to affect vested rights beyond its express operation.