Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2010 (1) TMI 53 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Reassessment and deduction interplay under section 80HHC: double deduction barred, jurisdictional cross-objection rejected, interest issue remanded Reassessment under section 147 was treated as sustainable where the original assessment had not properly examined the relevant deduction interplay and ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Reassessment and deduction interplay under section 80HHC: double deduction barred, jurisdictional cross-objection rejected, interest issue remanded

                          Reassessment under section 147 was treated as sustainable where the original assessment had not properly examined the relevant deduction interplay and later material supported a belief of escaped income; the assessee's jurisdictional cross-objection was not maintainable because a cross-objection cannot raise an issue not decided by the appellate authority. On deduction computation, the Tribunal followed the principle against double deduction and required section 80HHC profits to be reduced by deductions already allowed under section 80-IB/80-IA. On interest, netting of fixed-deposit interest against interest paid for section 80HHC required factual verification, so the matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer.




                          Issues: (i) Whether reassessment under section 147 was invalid as a mere change of opinion and whether the assessee could challenge jurisdiction by cross-objection; (ii) whether deduction under section 80HHC had to be computed after reducing the deduction allowed under section 80-IB/80-IA; and (iii) whether interest on fixed deposits could be netted against interest paid for computing deduction under section 80HHC.

                          Issue (i): Whether reassessment under section 147 was invalid as a mere change of opinion and whether the assessee could challenge jurisdiction by cross-objection?

                          Analysis: The original assessment had allowed the deductions without any proper examination of the interaction between the relevant Chapter VI-A provisions. The reopening was supported by material arising from the subsequent proceedings under section 263, which furnished the basis for forming the belief that excess deduction had been allowed. The Tribunal also held that a cross-objection lies only on a matter decided against the cross-objector by the appellate authority, and a jurisdictional issue not raised before or decided by the CIT(A) could not be agitated in cross-objection.

                          Conclusion: Reassessment under section 147 was held valid, and the assessee's cross-objection on jurisdiction was held not maintainable and dismissed.

                          Issue (ii): Whether deduction under section 80HHC had to be computed after reducing the deduction allowed under section 80-IB/80-IA?

                          Analysis: The Tribunal followed the Special Bench view that repeated deductions on the same profits are barred by section 80-IA(9), so profits already subjected to deduction under section 80-IB/80-IA cannot again be taken at full value for section 80HHC. The deduction under section 80HHC must therefore be worked out on the balance eligible profits after reducing the amount allowed under section 80-IB/80-IA.

                          Conclusion: The Revenue succeeded on this issue, and the deduction under section 80HHC was directed to be recomputed after reducing the section 80-IB/80-IA deduction.

                          Issue (iii): Whether interest on fixed deposits could be netted against interest paid for computing deduction under section 80HHC?

                          Analysis: The Tribunal applied the principle that, for the purpose of clause (baa) in the Explanation to section 80HHC, only net interest is relevant, and the nature of the receipt and the nexus between expenditure and interest income required factual examination by the Assessing Officer.

                          Conclusion: The issue was remitted to the Assessing Officer for fresh examination in accordance with law.

                          Final Conclusion: The assessee's jurisdictional challenge failed, the Revenue succeeded on the core deduction issue, and the interest-netting question was sent back for reconsideration, leaving the Revenue's appeal allowed for statistical purposes and the cross-objection dismissed.

                          Ratio Decidendi: A reassessment within the statutory period is sustainable where the original assessment lacked proper examination and subsequent material furnishes a basis for the belief that income has escaped assessment, and a cross-objection cannot be used to raise an issue that was neither decided by the appellate authority nor arises from its order.


                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found