Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee's undisclosed income in the block assessment could be fixed at Rs. 25 lakhs solely on the basis of a retracted statement recorded during search, or whether the assessment had to be restricted to the income supported by seized material and other admissible evidence.
Analysis: A statement recorded during search under section 132(4) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is admissible and an admission is an important piece of evidence, but it is not conclusive and may be shown to be incorrect or unreliable. In a block assessment under Chapter XIV-B, undisclosed income has to be determined on the basis of material found as a result of search or other relevant admissible material. The statement relied upon by the Revenue was made long after the search, the assessee had retracted it, and the record did not show that the seized documents themselves established undisclosed income of Rs. 25 lakhs. The amount disclosed in the block return was Rs. 7 lakhs, and the higher addition was not supported by corroborative material quantifying such income.
Conclusion: The addition of Rs. 25 lakhs was not sustainable. The undisclosed income was directed to be taken at Rs. 7 lakhs for the block period, and the assessee succeeded to that extent.