Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether income arising as dividends from shares and interest from deposits, acquired out of cash gifts made by the assessee to his wife, was includible in the assessee's total income under section 16(3)(a)(iii).
Analysis: The statutory language covers income arising directly or indirectly from assets transferred directly or indirectly to the wife by the husband. The cash gifts were direct transfers, and the wife's subsequent investment of those gifts in shares and deposits did not break the link between the transferred assets and the income earned from them. The requirement is not that the income must spring immediately from the transfer itself, but that there must be a proximate nexus between the transferred assets and the income. The earlier decision relied upon concerned a remote connection and was therefore distinguishable.
Conclusion: The income from dividends and interest was income indirectly arising from the assets transferred by the assessee to his wife and was correctly included in the assessee's taxable income.
Final Conclusion: The appeals failed because the statutory inclusion provision applied to income with a proximate connection to the transferred assets, even where the income arose after investment by the recipient spouse.
Ratio Decidendi: For section 16(3)(a)(iii), income is taxable if it arises directly or indirectly from assets transferred to the wife and the transfer must bear a proximate, not remote, connection with the income.