1981 (11) TMI 86 - AT - Wealth-tax

ITAT Cancels Penalty Orders for Assessment Years 1974-75 and 1975-76

SARAN KAUR (SMT). Versus WEALTH TAX OFFICER.

SARAN KAUR (SMT). Versus WEALTH TAX OFFICER. - TTJ 014, 340, Issues:Penalty under section 18(1)(c) of the WT Act, 1957 for undervaluation of jewellery in the returns for the assessment years 1974-75 and 1975-76.Detailed Analysis:1. Background and Penalty Imposition:The appeals were filed by the assessee against the penalty orders imposed by the WTO for undervaluation of jewellery in the returns for the assessment years 1974-75 and 1975-76. The WTO imposed penalties of Rs. 20,000 for each of the years, holding that the value declared by the assessee was less than 75% of the actual value of the assets at the time of assessment.2. Arguments Before the AAC:The assessee argued before the AAC that there was no intention to conceal wealth, as the jewellery was valued at Rs. 20,000 initially and later valued by a registered valuer at higher amounts. The assessee contended that she acted in good faith and did not engage in any fraudulent or willful neglectful behavior.3. AAC's Decision and Reasoning:The AAC noted that the assessee failed to prove that the undervaluation was not due to fraud or gross neglect. The AAC held that the assessee's disclosure of jewellery at Rs. 20,000, later assessed at Rs. 40,000, did not absolve her from proving lack of fraudulent intent. Consequently, the AAC confirmed the penalty orders of the WTO for both assessment years.4. Appeal to ITAT and Legal Arguments:The assessee appealed to the ITAT, arguing that she was not guilty of concealing the value of assets, and therefore, the penalties were unjustified. The Departmental Representative supported the lower authorities' orders, while the assessee's counsel emphasized the lack of fraudulent intent in the valuation process.5. ITAT's Analysis and Rulings:The ITAT considered various legal precedents and held that the assessee's actions demonstrated good faith. The ITAT emphasized that the assessee promptly complied with the valuation requirements upon the WTO's directive, indicating a lack of fraudulent intent or willful neglect. Citing the standard of proof required to establish lack of fraud or neglect, the ITAT concluded that the penalties imposed by the WTO could not be sustained.6. Final Decision and Outcome:In conclusion, the ITAT allowed both appeals in full, thereby canceling the penalty orders imposed by the WTO for the assessment years 1974-75 and 1975-76.