Tribunal Rules Disclosed Income in Regular Returns Excluded from Block Assessments, Deleting AO's Additions.

The Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting the additions made by the AO. It held that amounts disclosed in regular returns cannot be treated as undisclosed income in block assessment proceedings under Chapter XIV-B. The Tribunal emphasized that disclosed amounts should be questioned during regular assessments, not in block assessments.

---

---

Issues Involved:

1. Legitimacy of additions made by the Assessing Officer for the assessment years 1991-92, 1992-93, and 1994-95.
2. Whether the amount of Rs. 55 lakhs credited in the account of Concept International can be assessed as undisclosed income for the purpose of Chapter XIV-B.

Summary:

Issue 1: Legitimacy of Additions for Assessment Years 1991-92, 1992-93, and 1994-95

A search and seizure operation was conducted on 14/15-9-1995 u/s 132(1) of the Income-tax Act at the premises of the assessee. The initial assessment u/s 158BC was completed on 30-9-1996, determining undisclosed income at Rs. 2,01,58,230. This order was set aside by the Tribunal, and a fresh assessment was completed on 28-3-2002 at an income of Rs. 55,50,000. The assessee appealed against this order, arguing that the additions of Rs. 30,000 for 1991-92, Rs. 20,000 for 1992-93, and Rs. 55 lakhs for 1994-95 were unjustified as these amounts were disclosed in regular returns and no incriminating documents were found during the search. The Tribunal found that the amounts had been disclosed in regular returns and were shown in the balance sheet. Consequently, the Tribunal deleted the additions, stating that disclosed amounts cannot be treated as undisclosed income u/s 158BC.

Issue 2: Whether Rs. 55 Lakhs Credited in Concept International Account Can Be Assessed as Undisclosed Income

The Assessing Officer treated Rs. 55 lakhs as unexplained cash credits u/s 68, stating that the amount was not reflected in the balance sheet and the confirmation provided was not satisfactory. The Judicial Member held that the amount was disclosed in regular returns and should not be questioned in block assessment under Chapter XIV-B. The Accountant Member disagreed, stating that the credits were not assessed as income in any regular assessment and could be treated as undisclosed income based on the material found during the search. The matter was referred to a Third Member, who agreed with the Judicial Member, concluding that the amount was disclosed in the regular return, and the genuineness could have been questioned during regular assessments, not in block assessment proceedings. The Third Member emphasized that disclosed amounts in regular returns cannot be treated as undisclosed income for block assessments.

Conclusion:

The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer, and held that the disclosed amounts in regular returns cannot be treated as undisclosed income in block assessment proceedings.

---