Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal directs AO to allow deduction based on evidence, deems AO adjustments unjustifiable</h1> <h3>Sir Shadi Lal Enterprises Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax</h3> Sir Shadi Lal Enterprises Ltd. Versus Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax - ITD 048, 258, TTJ 048, 112, Issues Involved:1. Justification of the order passed under section 154.2. Prima facie adjustments under section 143(1)(a).3. Validity of the revised return filed on 9-1-1991.4. Basis for making prima facie adjustments under section 143(1)(a).5. Deletion of prima facie adjustments in respect of additions made under section 43B.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Justification of the Order Passed Under Section 154:The CIT(A) upheld the order passed under section 154, which was contested by the assessee. The Tribunal analyzed the background and the procedural aspects, noting that the assessee had filed objections and a revised return after discussions with the Assessing Officer (AO). The Tribunal concluded that the AO was too harsh and unreasonable in making adjustments without giving the assessee reasonable time to furnish proof, thus the order under section 154 was not justified.2. Prima Facie Adjustments Under Section 143(1)(a):The Tribunal examined whether the adjustments made by the AO under section 143(1)(a) were prima facie justified. It was argued that the AO had no power to disallow claims for lack of proof without issuing a notice for production of evidence. The Tribunal referred to the Delhi High Court's decision in SRF Charitable Trust and the Bombay High Court's decision in Khatau Junkar Ltd., which held that disallowances under section 143(1)(a) cannot be made for lack of evidence. The Tribunal concluded that the AO's adjustments were not prima facie disallowable.3. Validity of the Revised Return Filed on 9-1-1991:The Tribunal considered the validity of the revised return filed by the assessee on 9-1-1991. The AO had dismissed this return as a camouflage, arguing that the omission of attaching proof was known to the assessee at the time of filing the original return. The Tribunal disagreed, stating that under section 139(5), the assessee is entitled to rectify any omission by filing a revised return. The Tribunal found the AO's view that the revised return was a camouflage to be misconceived and unwarranted.4. Basis for Making Prima Facie Adjustments Under Section 143(1)(a):The Tribunal analyzed whether the information in the original and revised returns could be the basis for prima facie adjustments. It was argued that the AO should have allowed the deduction or required the assessee to furnish proof before making the disallowance. The Tribunal held that the AO was duty-bound to issue a notice for production of evidence and that the lack of proof did not justify the disallowance. The Tribunal emphasized that procedural requirements should not be strictly construed without considering the purpose behind them.5. Deletion of Prima Facie Adjustments in Respect of Additions Made Under Section 43B:The Tribunal examined whether the adjustments made under section 43B were justified. It was noted that the assessee had made statutory payments before the due date for filing the return and had indicated the availability of voluminous evidence. The Tribunal concluded that the AO's strict interpretation of the proviso to section 43B was unwarranted and that the disallowance of a substantial amount on a technical ground was unjustifiable. The Tribunal directed the AO to modify the intimation order and allow the deduction based on the information and evidence available.Conclusion:The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, directing the AO to modify the intimation order and allow the deduction based on the information and evidence provided, including the evidence furnished with the revised return. The adjustments made by the AO under section 143(1)(a) were deemed unjustifiable and uncalled for.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found