Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the payment for design and documentation remitted to the French contractor was royalty within the meaning of section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act and Article VII of the India-France Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, and therefore liable to tax deduction at source.
Analysis: The payment was for documentation and designs supplied under the contract for setting up the plant. The documentation embodied information derived from the foreign contractor's industrial, commercial or scientific experience, and the definition of royalty in the treaty as well as in section 9(1)(vi) was wide enough to cover such consideration. The absence of a permanent establishment in India did not preclude taxation of royalty under the treaty. The contract was also severable, so the documentation payment could be examined independently of other services.
Conclusion: The payment was royalty and taxable in India, so tax deduction at source was rightly required. The issue is decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Consideration paid for documentation or designs which constitute information drawn from industrial, commercial or scientific experience is royalty and is taxable under the India-France treaty and section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.