Tribunal Affirms Deletion of Unexplained Credits Addition; Emphasizes Evidence Over Suspicion in Tax Disputes.

The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition made under section 68 of the IT Act, 1961, for unexplained credits in the assessee's bank account. The AO's reliance on third-party statements without concrete evidence was deemed insufficient. The Tribunal emphasized that suspicion cannot replace legal proof, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

---

---

Issues involved: Appeal against deletion of addition made under section 68 of the IT Act, 1961 for unexplained credits in assessee's bank account.

Summary:
The assessment was reopened based on information received regarding alleged false long-term capital gain transactions. The AO concluded the reported shares transaction was not genuine, adding the credited amount in the bank account as unexplained credit. The CIT(A) deleted the addition, stating the AO failed to prove the transaction was bogus and shifted the onus improperly. The Revenue appealed, arguing the CIT(A) wrongly shifted the onus. The assessee provided evidence supporting the share transactions, including purchase and sale details, which were accepted in previous assessments. The AO relied on third-party statements without concrete evidence, leading to the deletion of the addition by the CIT(A). The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision, noting the lack of evidence supporting the AO's claim of non-genuineness, emphasizing that suspicion cannot replace legal proof. The Revenue's appeal was dismissed.

---