Substitution of legal representatives permitted where a wealth-tax application was filed in the name of a deceased person.

An application under section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act filed in the name of a deceased person was treated as valid where the death was not known at the time of filing. The Tribunal held that such proceedings are a continuation of the appeal, not a civil suit governed by the CPC rules on abatement or substitution. In the absence of any specific statutory time-limit or procedure in the wealth-tax and income-tax framework for impleading legal representatives, Rule 26 of the Tribunal Rules was relied on to support continuation of the proceeding. The legal representatives were therefore permitted to be substituted on record.

---

---

Issues: Whether an application under section 27(1) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 filed in the name of a person who had already died was invalid or non est, and whether the legal representatives could be substituted on record.

Analysis: The proceeding under section 27(1) was treated as a continuation of the appeal and not as a civil suit governed by the Code of Civil Procedure provisions on death of parties, abatement, or substitution. The absence of a specific statutory time-limit or procedure in the wealth-tax and income-tax framework for bringing legal representatives on record was significant. Rule 26 of the Tribunal Rules, 1963 was relied upon to show that death of a party does not cause abatement in Tribunal proceedings. Authorities dealing with references or applications under other provisions were distinguished, and the view was accepted that an erroneous description of the respondent does not by itself nullify the application where the death was not known when the application was filed.

Conclusion: The application was not invalid or non est, and substitution of the legal representatives was permitted.

---