Severability in photographic contracts: taking and developing negatives is service, while supplying additional prints is a taxable sale.

In a mixed photographic transaction, the contract for taking a customer's photograph and developing the negative was treated as a contract of work and labour, because the dominant element was professional skill and service with only incidental transfer of materials, so that stage was not liable to sales tax. By contrast, the supply of additional photographic prints was treated as a severable commercial sale of finished goods for consideration and was held taxable under the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975. The decision applies the severability principle to distinguish the service component from the sale component in photographic services.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the contract for taking a photograph of a customer and developing the negative was a contract of sale or a contract of work and labour; (ii) Whether the supply of further photographic prints to customers amounted to a sale exigible to tax under the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975.

Issue (i): Whether the contract for taking a photograph of a customer and developing the negative was a contract of sale or a contract of work and labour.

Analysis: The relevant question was whether the transaction, to that extent, was merely an exercise of professional skill and labour with transfer of materials only incidental, or whether it was a sale of goods. Applying the distinction between a contract of sale and a contract for work and labour, and following the view that such photographic services are severable from the commercial sale element, the taking of the photograph and development of the negative were treated as the service component of the transaction.

Conclusion: The contract up to the stage of taking the photograph and developing the negative was held to be a contract of work and labour and not liable to sales tax.

Issue (ii): Whether the supply of further photographic prints to customers amounted to a sale exigible to tax under the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975.

Analysis: The supply of additional prints was treated as the commercial part of the transaction, distinct from the service element involved in taking the photograph and preparing the first negative. On the principle of severability, the later stage involved production and supply of finished goods for consideration, falling within the scope of the relevant schedule entry and the taxing notification.

Conclusion: The supply of further photographic prints was held to be a sale liable to sales tax.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only in part, with the service component excluded from tax while the sale component of supplying photographic prints remained taxable.

Ratio Decidendi: In a mixed photographic transaction, the contract is severable where the taking of the photograph and preparation of the negative are professional services, while the supply of further prints constitutes a distinct taxable sale.

---