Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether Schedule III of the Wealth-tax Act could be applied for valuing a composite property in pending assessments, and whether the land and building method was appropriate for such valuation.
Analysis: Section 7 of the Wealth-tax Act deals with the mode of valuation and is procedural in nature. Schedule III, introduced to replace Rule 1BB, was intended to provide certainty and uniformity in valuation. The property in question was a composite unit used partly for residence and partly for a nursing home, with the residential and commercial portions not being separately severable in respect of the land. In these circumstances, the land and building method was considered unsuitable. The rent capitalisation method, recognised in Schedule III, was held to be the proper basis for valuation. The Wealth-tax Officer was also held empowered to apply Rule 8 of Part B of Schedule III if applicable.
Conclusion: Schedule III was held applicable for valuation, the land and building method was rejected as inappropriate, and the matter was sent back for fresh valuation on the basis directed.