Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the receipt from charter hire of boats fell within item 5(g) of the Schedule to the agreement for avoidance of double taxation or within the residuary item 9.
Analysis: The agreement required income from specified sources or categories of transactions to be allocated according to the Schedule. Item 5(g) covered transport by ships, air or road and did not confine itself to freight alone. Item 9 operated only as a residuary provision for income not falling within any specific item. Since the receipt arose from transport by ships and the traffic originated in the relevant territory, the receipt was within item 5(g) and not item 9.
Conclusion: The receipt was covered by item 5(g) and was not taxable in India under item 9; the answer was in favour of the assessee on the reference, but the appeal itself failed and the Revenue succeeded in resisting interference.
Final Conclusion: The reference was answered by holding that the impugned receipt fell within the transport category in the Schedule, and the appeal was dismissed with costs.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a payment is derived from transport by ships, the specific transport entry in a double taxation schedule prevails over the residuary entry, and the label of the receipt does not control its tax character.