Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether gold or silver ornaments without precious or semi-precious stones embedded on them were exempt from inclusion in taxable wealth under section 5(1)(viii) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957 for the assessment years 1970-71 and 1971-72, notwithstanding the Explanation inserted by the Finance Act (No. 2) of 1971 with retrospective effect.
Analysis: The Tribunal held that, for the period prior to the amendment and insertion of Explanation I, the expression "jewellery" in section 5(1)(viii) did not include gold ornaments that had no precious or semi-precious stones embedded on them. It followed the binding view of the Orissa High Court on the same question and accepted that the retrospective amendment did not alter the position for the years in question.
Conclusion: The ornaments were not liable to be included in the assessee's taxable wealth, and the exclusion directed by the appellate authority was upheld.