TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the sum paid by the assessee to discharge tax deductible at source from payments made to a non-resident technical collaborator could be treated as a bad debt. (ii) Whether the same sum was deductible as expenditure wholly and exclusively laid out for the purposes of the assessee's business.
Issue (i): Whether the sum paid by the assessee to discharge tax deductible at source from payments made to a non-resident technical collaborator could be treated as a bad debt.
Analysis: A bad debt must be a proper business or trading debt arising directly from the carrying on of the business and incidental to it. The amount in question arose not from a trading advance or business debt, but from the assessee's failure to comply with the statutory obligation to deduct tax at source. A liability created by non-compliance with the taxing statute could not be treated as a debt incidental to business merely because the underlying payments related to technical assistance.
Conclusion: The amount was not deductible as a bad debt and the conclusion was against the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether the same sum was deductible as expenditure wholly and exclusively laid out for the purposes of the assessee's business.
Analysis: Expenditure under the business deduction provision must be laid out wholly and exclusively for the purpose of the business. A payment made because the assessee had become liable under the statute for failure to deduct tax at source was not a business outlay incurred for business purposes. The payment was made to discharge a statutory default and could not be converted into allowable business expenditure merely because the assessee hoped to preserve commercial relations with the foreign collaborator.
Conclusion: The amount was not deductible as business expenditure and the conclusion was against the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to deduct the sum either as a bad debt or as business expenditure, and the appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: A liability incurred by reason of failure to comply with a statutory obligation to deduct tax at source is neither a trading debt nor expenditure wholly and exclusively laid out for the purposes of business.
TaxTMI 
